Example brief used for this template
Hypothetical creation brief for this authored edition, not a historical prompt transcript. The sample answers describe the actual example rendered here.
- Purpose and audience
- A product requirements document with scope, user tasks, acceptance criteria, and open decisions.
- Working context
- This fictional feature gives a project owner a maintained handover index. The specification describes desired behavior for review and does not claim that the feature is already implemented.
- Example records
- Requirement: Create an entry · Expected behavior: Owner adds purpose and location · Acceptance check: Entry appears with required fields
Requirement: Assign responsibility · Expected behavior: Entry names an update owner · Acceptance check: Owner is visible beside the item
Requirement: Mark status · Expected behavior: Entry shows draft or approved · Acceptance check: Status remains readable without color
Requirement: Review history · Expected behavior: A review date is recorded · Acceptance check: Date is visible in the index
- Content decisions
- User problem: A receiving collaborator can open the project folder but cannot tell which item is current or who maintains it. The feature should help them complete that orientation task.
Scope boundaries: The first version organizes references and responsibility. It does not add a new file editor, automatic synchronization, or a permission system of its own.
Open decisions: Confirm who may approve an entry, how archived items appear, and what happens when a referenced file is removed. Resolve these behaviors before implementation begins.
- Format and interaction
- spec layout; section navigation and expandable detail where useful; matching portrait document PDF.
- Sharing and provenance
- A hypothetical example informed by Claw Me’s small-team and Agent workflows. These are not Pete’s actual clients, finances, travel plans, research results, or commitments. Keep the real adaptation private until the owner chooses to share.