Example brief used for this template
Hypothetical creation brief for this authored edition, not a historical prompt transcript. The sample answers describe the actual example rendered here.
- Purpose and audience
- Triage issues with impact, reproducibility, ownership, and a next investigation step.
- Working context
- This fictional product review contains four reported issues. Severity reflects the effect on a user task; priority also considers how many people are affected and whether a workaround exists.
- Example records
- Issue: Menu link fails · Impact: Visitor cannot open menu · Owner: Leo · Next step: Reproduce on mobile
Issue: Long title wraps poorly · Impact: Heading remains readable · Owner: Maya · Next step: Check narrow layout
Issue: Old support address · Impact: Contact reaches wrong inbox · Owner: Sam · Next step: Verify current address
Issue: Missing image description · Impact: Context unavailable to some readers · Owner: Robin · Next step: Write meaningful alt text
- Content decisions
- Triage order: Verify the broken menu link and incorrect contact address first because they prevent intended actions. The heading wrap and image description still need owners and acceptance checks.
A useful issue record: Record the page, device, expected result, actual result, and a minimal reproduction. Avoid including private account data in screenshots. Link the verified evidence in the private issue system.
Close with a check: An issue is resolved when the original task works in the affected context and a reviewer confirms the result. A code change alone is not evidence that the user’s problem has gone away.
- Format and interaction
- board layout; section navigation and expandable detail where useful; matching portrait document PDF.
- Sharing and provenance
- A hypothetical example informed by Claw Me’s small-team and Agent workflows. These are not Pete’s actual clients, finances, travel plans, research results, or commitments. Keep the real adaptation private until the owner chooses to share.